Global Mobility

Five red flags in your global mobility vendor stack

If three or more of these show up in your programme, you're paying for vendor friction instead of mobility outcomes.

Sarah BeckerMobility Programme Lead
April 29, 20266 min read
Team reviewing supplier contracts
Share

Most programmes don't have a vendor problem — they have a vendor-visibility problem. Here are five signals that the stack is leaking value, and what to do about each.

1. Invoices arrive 30+ days after service

If you can't see what was delivered until the invoice lands, you can't manage accruals or quality. Push for milestone-based reporting in your vendor SLAs.

2. No standard data file across countries

Each DSP sends a different spreadsheet. You spend Fridays reconciling. Standardise on a 12-field minimum schema in the next contract round.

3. Assignees ping HR before pinging the vendor

That's a sign the vendor isn't visible in the assignee app. Move comms into a shared assignee portal.

4. No vendor scorecard reviewed quarterly

If you can't rank your top 10 vendors by NPS, on-time delivery and exception rate, your renegotiations are vibes-based.

5. Single point of failure on key corridors

One DSP in Singapore, one immigration partner in the US. Build a backup in the top 3 corridors before you need one.

From xpath.global
Run a vendor health-check

We benchmark your top 10 vendors against the xpath.global marketplace and flag concentration risk.

Benchmark vendors
Written by
Sarah Becker
Mobility Programme Lead
Share

Mobility insights, in your inbox.

Country alerts, programme benchmarks and product updates — once a month, no fluff.