HR

How one programme cut relocation costs by 18% without changing policy

A case study in cost control: how a 600-move programme found 18% savings in 90 days, just by changing how it tracked and approved spend.

Sarah BeckerMobility Programme Lead
March 25, 20267 min read
Cost analysis on a laptop
Share

A European industrials client came to us with a fully-loaded relocation budget of €11.4M across 600 moves. Ninety days later, the same policy, the same vendors and the same volume cost €9.3M. Here's what changed.

The diagnosis

Three issues showed up immediately in the data: 22% of moves had at least one out-of-policy exception approved by email; vendor invoices were averaging 11% over the agreed rate card; and 14% of lump-sum payments were unused but not clawed back.

What changed

  1. Exception approvals moved into the platform with a mandatory cost code and justification
  2. Rate card variances were flagged at invoice-receipt, not month-end
  3. Lump-sum receipts were required within 60 days or auto-reversed

The result

€2.1M annualised saving. No change to policy entitlements. The assignee experience scored higher in the post-move survey because approvals were faster, not slower.

From xpath.global
Want a cost-control health-check?

We benchmark your top 5 cost lines against the xpath.global network in two weeks.

Request a benchmark
Written by
Sarah Becker
Mobility Programme Lead
Share

Mobility insights, in your inbox.

Country alerts, programme benchmarks and product updates — once a month, no fluff.