xpath.global
0 of 12 questions answered

Global Mobility Cost Efficiency Assessment

How much does your company pay to operate Global Mobility — before it moves a single employee?

Most organisations know roughly what they spend on moving employees. Far fewer can see the cost of operating the programme itself: hours spent coordinating advisers, chasing documents, updating spreadsheets, processing invoices, answering employee questions and managing suppliers, spread across teams and cost centres.

Service spend vs operating cost

Immigration filings, tax services, relocation and moving are programme service spend. The labour, coordination, supplier management, invoicing, reporting and rework needed to run them is operating cost. This assessment looks at the second — and keeps the two separate.

7-minute screening

Twelve questions about how your mobility operation runs.

Business-level answers only. Don't enter employee names, salaries or documents.

01Annual new mobility cases / moves?
02How many countries are involved?
03Who manages daily coordination?
04Mobility-related internal FTEs?
05Number of active service providers?
06How much of the workflow is manual?
07Can Finance see the full cost per move?
08Are supplier SLAs centrally monitored?
09Would 25% activity growth require more internal headcount?
10Which responsibilities must stay in-house?(select all that apply)
11Primary business priority?
12Preferred next action?

Answer questions 3 and 5–9 to see your suitability screening.

Illustrative screening, not a validated benchmark. Scores never translate into a savings percentage.

Estimative calculator

Estimate your annual operating cost.

Enter your own figures, or start from typical planning assumptions and adjust them in the full assessment. The maths is transparent: internal labour, coordination hours, supplier management and evidenced rework — nothing else.

Coordination effort uses your screening answer on manual work (partly: ~8h per case; rework ~6% of service spend). Answer question 6 above to refine it.

Enter at least your annual cases, FTEs and average salary to see the estimate.

What you keep vs what a Managed Mobility partner can run.

ActivityClient retainsxpath.global may manage
Talent and workforce strategyBusiness ownershipOperating insight and support
Policy design and exceptionsOwnership and approvalsPolicy administration and escalation
Budget approvalsFinal authorityRoute and track approvals
Case intake and managementService scope and supervisionCases, tasks, handoffs, status
Tax / immigration / social securityEmployer legal obligationsSpecialist provider coordination
Relocation / destination / movingStandards and limitsSupplier sourcing and coordination
Employee queriesService expectationsDay-to-day support and updates
Documents and expiryPrivacy and access governanceCollection, reminders, audit trail
Vendor governanceCommercial / escalation authoritySLA monitoring, reporting, follow-ups
Financial reportingFinance control and sign-offOperational data and cost visibility

Illustrative allocation, not a transfer of statutory employer obligations or regulated professional accountability. Contractual scope determines actual delivery.

A fictional worked example.

Annual operating costInternal modelManaged model
Dedicated mobility operationsEUR 110,000EUR 25,000
Shared HR / Finance administrationEUR 35,000EUR 15,000
Existing external coordinationEUR 45,000EUR 0
Technology and systemsEUR 20,000EUR 5,000
Transactions / evidenced reworkEUR 30,000EUR 15,000
New managed-services feeEUR 0EUR 120,000
Total run-rateEUR 240,000EUR 180,000

Illustrative result: a EUR 60,000 annual economic difference. That is not automatically a cash saving — time released is capacity unless spending genuinely falls, and transition costs, ramp-up and retained internal oversight change year-one results. All figures are fictional and do not represent xpath.global client results or a fee quotation.

Seven cost drivers, three operating choices.

Internal labourCoordinationSuppliersAdministrationTechnologyLeakage and reworkOversight

01Improved in-house

Your team keeps running the operation, with better process, tooling and supplier governance.

02Co-managed

You keep policy, approvals and governance; a partner runs agreed cases, vendors and reporting.

03Fully managed

You retain strategic control while a partner takes day-to-day operational responsibility under agreed SLAs.

How the full assessment works

  1. 1.Screen
  2. 2.Map
  3. 3.Price
  4. 4.Stress test
  5. 5.Review

The next move

Request your personalised Cost Efficiency Assessment.

We map your current responsibilities, costs and growth triggers, then compare improved in-house, co-managed and fully managed models on a like-for-like basis — with cash, capacity and risk shown separately.

This assessment is a diagnostic model, not a guarantee, binding quotation or legal, tax or accounting opinion. Outcomes depend on verified inputs and equivalent scope; savings may be lower, zero or negative.