Italy Checklist: Sponsoring Highly Skilled Migrant Visas
Grab a copy of a guide to international employee relocation
View E-book
When a global pharmaceutical company needed to launch operations in Brazil, they faced a critical decision: send executives on traditional three-year assignments at $750,000 per assignee, or deploy specialists on rotating six-month assignments at 40% lower cost. They chose the short-term approach—and within 18 months, realized they’d created a compliance nightmare involving 47 incomplete tax filings, inconsistent knowledge transfer, and employee burnout from constant rotation.
This scenario illustrates the challenge facing every global mobility professional today. According to Cartus’ 2024 Global Mobility Policy & Practices Survey, 61% of organizations have increased their use of short-term assignments over the past three years, yet many lack structured frameworks to determine when each assignment type delivers optimal results.
Assignment structure selection represents one of the most consequential decisions in global mobility program design. The wrong choice doesn’t just inflate costs—it creates compliance exposure, damages employee experience, and undermines business objectives. In this article, you’ll discover the fundamental differences between short-term and long-term assignment structures, the strategic considerations that should drive your selection, and how leading organizations are leveraging technology to optimize assignment design across their entire global workforce.
Quick Answer for Featured Snippet: Short-term assignments typically last 3-12 months with employees maintaining home country ties and limited relocation support. Long-term assignments extend beyond 12 months, involve full relocation with comprehensive benefits packages, and often include family members. The optimal structure depends on business objectives, cost tolerance, compliance requirements, and employee circumstances.
While these definitions seem straightforward, the reality involves nuanced variations:
Short-Term Assignments (3-12 months): These assignments focus on specific projects, knowledge transfer, or temporary capability gaps. Employees typically maintain their home country employment contracts, residence, and family location while working temporarily in the host location.
Long-Term Assignments (12+ months): Traditional expatriate assignments involve relocating employees (often with families) for extended periods—typically 2-5 years—to fill critical leadership roles, develop local operations, or build strategic capabilities. These assignments include comprehensive relocation support and benefits.
Emerging Hybrid Models: The lines are blurring. Extended short-term assignments (12-24 months) and commuter arrangements create grey areas requiring careful structuring to avoid the worst of both worlds—high costs without integration benefits.
The global mobility landscape has transformed dramatically. BGRS’ 2024 Worldwide Survey of International Assignment Policies and Practices reveals that traditional long-term assignments now comprise only 38% of international deployments, down from 67% a decade ago. Short-term assignments, rotational programs, and permanent transfers have surged as organizations seek flexibility and cost efficiency.
Remote work has further complicated assignment structuring. What happens when a “short-term” assignment extends indefinitely because the employee works remotely from the host location? These scenarios create tax, immigration, and employment law complexities that traditional assignment frameworks never anticipated.
Traditional expatriate assignments carry substantial financial implications. According to research from AIRINC, the average annual cost of a long-term assignment ranges from $250,000 to $400,000 per assignee when including:
🔸 Base Salary and Incentives: Hardship premiums (10-35% of base salary), cost of living allowances, and assignment completion bonuses create significant ongoing costs
🔸 Relocation Expenses: International moving costs ($15,000-$40,000), temporary accommodation, home sale/purchase assistance, and destination services add substantial upfront investment
🔸 Housing and Living Costs: Employer-provided housing or housing allowances, utilities, and cost of living differentials in expensive locations like Singapore, London, or New York dramatically increase annual expenses
🔸 Family Support: Spouse career assistance, education allowances ($20,000-$50,000 annually per child), language training, and home leave trips multiply costs exponentially
🔸 Tax Equalization: Protecting employees from double taxation or unexpected tax increases often costs 20-30% of base salary through gross-up calculations and tax preparation fees
Short-term assignments appear more economical on the surface, with average costs ranging from $75,000 to $150,000 per assignment. However, hidden costs often emerge:
🔸 Per Diem and Temporary Accommodation: Daily living allowances ($150-$400 per day) and extended-stay housing in business districts quickly accumulate, sometimes exceeding long-term housing costs over 9-12 months
🔸 Frequent Travel Costs: Regular home trips for employees maintaining family and residence in the home country add $3,000-$8,000 per round-trip journey
🔸 Duplicate Living Costs: Employees maintain expenses in both home and host locations—mortgages, vehicle payments, storage fees—requiring additional allowances
🔸 Productivity Gaps: Knowledge transfer suffers when assignments end just as employees become fully productive, creating hidden efficiency costs that don’t appear in mobility budgets
🔸 Compliance Complexity: Managing tax, immigration, and social security for multiple short-term assignees often requires more administrative effort than fewer long-term assignments
The true comparison extends beyond direct costs to include business impact, compliance risk, and employee experience. Organizations using comprehensive case management platforms gain visibility into total assignment costs, enabling data-driven decisions about optimal assignment structures for specific situations.
Assignment structure selection creates dramatically different tax consequences for both employers and employees.
Long-Term Assignment Tax Considerations:
Long-term assignments typically trigger host country tax residency after 183 days, creating obligations for corporate and individual income tax in the host location. Most organizations provide tax equalization to protect employees from unfavorable tax outcomes, but this benefit comes at significant cost.
The positive side? Tax treaties often provide mechanisms to avoid double taxation and may allow continued home country social security participation under totalization agreements. Clear tax residency status, while creating compliance obligations, provides certainty for planning and reporting.
Short-Term Assignment Tax Complexity:
Short-term assignments create tax uncertainty. The assignment may or may not trigger host country tax obligations depending on duration, work activities, and treaty provisions. According to EY’s 2024 Global Tax Alert, tax authorities worldwide are increasing scrutiny of short-term business travelers and challenging positions that workers performing substantive activities are exempt from local taxation.
Complications multiply when assignments extend unexpectedly. What begins as a 90-day project-based deployment that avoids host country taxation can cross critical thresholds, triggering retroactive tax obligations and penalties. Research from KPMG indicates that 44% of organizations have faced unexpected tax liabilities related to short-term assignment overruns.
Long-Term Immigration Requirements:
Long-term assignments require formal work permits and visas designed for extended stays—often more expensive and time-consuming to obtain, but providing clear legal status for the assignment duration. Processing times range from 2-8 weeks in streamlined jurisdictions to 6+ months in countries with restrictive immigration policies.
Family members typically receive dependent visas, and many countries allow trailing spouses to work under specific conditions—an important recruitment and retention consideration addressed through dual career support programs.
Short-Term Immigration Considerations:
Many countries allow short business visits (30-90 days) without formal work authorization, creating a tempting path to avoid immigration compliance. However, this approach carries significant risk. Immigration authorities increasingly challenge claims that substantive work activities qualify as “business visits,” particularly when repeated or extended.
Some jurisdictions have created specific short-term work permits with streamlined processing (Germany’s temporary work exemption, UK’s Temporary Work – International Agreement route), but requirements vary dramatically. Utilizing immigration tracking solutions across 183 countries ensures compliance regardless of assignment structure or destination.
Social security obligations create one of the most complex aspects of assignment structuring. Long-term assignments often qualify for certificate of coverage arrangements under bilateral totalization agreements, allowing continued home country contributions and avoiding dual social security taxation potentially exceeding 40% in some European countries.
Short-term assignments may not qualify for these protections, particularly when employees approach but don’t exceed local thresholds. The administrative burden of managing social security compliance for multiple short-term assignees often exceeds the effort required for fewer long-term assignments with certificate of coverage documentation properly maintained.
Long-term assignments remain the optimal choice in specific circumstances:
🔸 Leadership Development and Succession Planning: International experience forms a critical component of executive development programs. Long-term assignments provide the depth of experience needed for cultural competency and global leadership capability building.
🔸 Market Entry and Establishment: Launching operations in new markets requires sustained leadership presence to build relationships, establish organizational culture, and navigate local business environments. Success typically demands 2-3 year commitments.
🔸 Knowledge Transfer and Capability Building: Developing local talent or establishing technical capabilities requires extended engagement. Short-term deployments lack sufficient duration for meaningful mentorship and skill transfer.
🔸 Complex Stakeholder Management: Roles requiring deep customer relationships, government liaison, or intricate partner ecosystems benefit from continuity that only long-term presence provides.
🔸 Family-Oriented Employees: When relocation with family is necessary or desired, long-term structures provide education stability, spouse career support, and community integration that short-term arrangements cannot accommodate.
Short-term structures deliver superior outcomes in different scenarios:
🔸 Project-Based Work: Defined deliverables with clear endpoints—system implementations, plant commissioning, training programs—align naturally with short-term assignment timeframes and cost structures.
🔸 Emergency Coverage and Gap Filling: Unexpected departures, illness, or temporary capability shortages require rapid deployment without long-term commitment or full relocation infrastructure.
🔸 Skill Transfer and Training: Deploying subject matter experts to deliver specific training or share specialized knowledge often requires only 3-6 months, making short-term structures more efficient.
🔸 Cost-Constrained Environments: When budget pressures limit mobility program spending, short-term assignments provide international experience at reduced cost—though be cautious of hidden expenses that erode initial savings.
🔸 Trial Assignments: Before committing to full relocation, short-term “test” assignments allow employees and families to experience the location while assessing cultural fit and business need sustainability.
Forward-thinking organizations are developing innovative structures that blend advantages of both traditional models:
Rotational Assignments: Alternating periods in home and host locations (e.g., 6 weeks host / 2 weeks home) provide sustained presence while maintaining home country connections. These work well for operational roles in mining, energy, and construction sectors.
Commuter Assignments: Employees work in the host location during the week and return home on weekends, avoiding full relocation while providing consistent presence. Success requires geographic proximity and employee willingness to maintain the demanding schedule.
Extended Short-Term Assignments: Extending beyond 12 months but structured as short-term (limited benefits, no family relocation) can reduce costs, but creates substantial tax and compliance complexity requiring expert guidance.
The most effective global mobility programs don’t force every situation into identical structures—they provide frameworks enabling customized solutions:
1. Develop Clear Assignment Structure Guidelines
Create decision matrices helping stakeholders select appropriate structures based on objective criteria: assignment purpose, duration, family status, cost parameters, and compliance complexity. Comprehensive global mobility platforms provide tools to document assignment structures, automate workflows specific to each type, and maintain consistent policy application across your organization.
2. Implement Robust Pre-Assignment Planning
The time invested before deployment determines assignment success. Conduct thorough needs analysis asking:
3. Create Assignment Extension Protocols
Short-term assignments frequently extend beyond initial plans—59% according to Mercer’s 2024 mobility research. Establish clear processes for evaluating extensions including:
4. Leverage Technology for Complexity Management
Manual tracking systems collapse under the complexity of mixed assignment populations. Modern case management technology provides real-time visibility across assignment types, automates compliance monitoring, and generates reports comparing costs and outcomes across structures. Integration with vendor marketplaces providing 60,000+ services across 183 countries enables consistent support delivery regardless of assignment structure.
Leading organizations continuously evaluate assignment structure effectiveness through metrics including:
🔸 Cost per Assignment by Structure: Track total costs enabling accurate comparisons and identifying hidden expense drivers
🔸 Assignment Success Rates: Measure completion rates, early repatriations, and objective achievement by structure type
🔸 Employee Satisfaction Scores: Survey assignees and families about experience quality across different assignment structures
🔸 Business Outcome Achievement: Evaluate whether assignments delivered intended results—knowledge transfer completion, market establishment milestones, leadership development progression
🔸 Compliance Incident Rates: Monitor tax, immigration, and regulatory compliance issues by assignment structure to identify risk patterns
Data-driven insights enable continuous program refinement, shifting investment toward structures delivering optimal return for specific assignment purposes and populations.
The choice between short-term and long-term assignment structures isn’t binary—it’s strategic. While short-term assignments offer apparent cost advantages and deployment flexibility, they create compliance complexity and may undermine the knowledge transfer and relationship building that international assignments exist to deliver. Long-term assignments provide depth and continuity but demand substantial investment and comprehensive support infrastructure.
The most successful global mobility programs recognize that different business needs require different assignment structures. The key lies in developing clear selection frameworks, maintaining flexibility to adapt structures to specific circumstances, and implementing technology systems that manage complexity across diverse assignment types without exponentially increasing administrative burden.
Transform your assignment structure decisions from instinct-driven to data-informed. Explore xpath.global’s comprehensive platform designed to manage both short-term and long-term assignments through unified case management, automated compliance tracking across immigration, tax, and social security requirements, and access to specialized service providers in 183 countries. Whether deploying five assignees or managing five hundred, our ISO-certified platform provides the visibility, automation, and expert vendor network needed to optimize assignment structures, control costs, and ensure every international deployment delivers maximum business value with minimal compliance risk.
Previous article
Italy Checklist: Sponsoring Highly Skilled Migrant Visas
Grab a copy of a guide to international employee relocation
View E-book